FTSE 100 ▲ 8,142.55 +0.42% GBP/USD 1.2731 BRENT $84.12 BTC £52,901 BoE base rate 4.75% London 12° Overcast Sterling steady ahead of CPI print FTSE 100 ▲ 8,142.55 +0.42% GBP/USD 1.2731 BRENT $84.12 BTC £52,901 BoE base rate 4.75% London 12° Overcast Sterling steady ahead of CPI print
Sunday, 24 May 2026
PoliticsWestminster★ Premium

Historic House of Lords reform bill passes first reading

Hereditary peers face removal in the most radical constitutional change in a century.

EH
Eleanor Hughes
Today, 09:14 · 7 min read
Historic House of Lords reform bill passes first reading

Westminster witnessed one of its most consequential afternoons in decades as the upper chamber narrowly waved through a constitutional shake-up many believed unthinkable a generation ago.

The bill, championed by a cross-bench alliance, would phase out the remaining hereditary peers by the end of the next parliamentary session and introduce a statutory age cap of 80.

Subscriber-only article

Keep reading Historic House of Lords reform bill passes first reading.

You've read 2 of 3 paragraphs. Unlock the rest of this comment piece — plus every Opinion article — from £1 for your first month.

  • Unlimited access to every Premium article
  • The Daily Briefing newsletter, 6am every weekday
  • Cancel any time. No ads, ever.

Already a subscriber? Sign in to continue reading.

Reader comments

8 comments

On: Historic House of Lords reform bill passes first reading

Join the discussion

Comments are moderated. Be civil.

  • DP
    David PritchardSurrey · 3 hrs ago

    Sorry but this is just lazy journalism. Half the 'facts' here are opinion dressed up as analysis. Do better.

  • JA
    Jenny AdamsonNewcastle · Yesterday

    Read this twice. First time I was furious. Second time I started to see the point. Hate when that happens.

  • GH
    George HollisBrighton · 2 hrs ago

    I disagree with almost every conclusion in this article and I still want to thank the author for writing it properly.

  • BW
    Ben WhitfieldLondon · 8 hrs ago

    Good piece but the comments section under it is going to be a warzone within the hour. Grab the popcorn.

  • PJ
    Priya JoshiLeicester · 34 min ago

    The middle section about the long-term consequences is the bit nobody else has written. That's the real story.

  • HR
    Hannah ReidEdinburgh · 5 hrs ago

    Sharing this with my book club tonight. We've been arguing about exactly this for two months.

  • PG
    Paul GreenwayNottingham · Yesterday

    Spelling mistake in paragraph four — 'its' should be 'it's'. Otherwise a decent read.

  • SO
    Sarah O'ConnorGlasgow · 12 min ago

    Cancelled my subscription last year and came back specifically for this kind of writing. Worth every penny.

Related

Keep reading.